News

The slow awakening of female talent in technical subjects

With Women’s Day on March 9 due to celebrate the progress made in gender equality, the percentage of women choosing to study science and technology subjects is still not rising fast enough to close the gap with men

“With no women in the automotive sector, there won’t be anyone to think about how women drive”
“It has become normal for girls to play football. the same logic should be followed in science and technology”
of university students
in STEM degree subjects are women

As In­ter­na­tional Women’s Day ap­proaches on March 8 to cel­e­brate the ad­vances that so­ci­ety has made in re­cent times to achieve greater par­ity be­tween the sexes, some areas still lag be­hind. A key ex­am­ple is that the rise in the num­ber of women choos­ing tech­no­log­i­cal and sci­en­tific ca­reers con­tin­ues to rise at a very slow pace. De­spite all the ef­forts and ini­tia­tives made in the pri­vate and pub­lic spheres to get more women into these sub­jects, there is still a lot of work to be done. In Cat­alo­nia, only 32% of stu­dents doing STEM sub­jects (sci­ence, tech­nol­ogy, en­gi­neer­ing and math­e­mat­ics) at uni­ver­sity are women.

Nev­er­the­less, after years of stag­na­tion, and even at times re­gres­sion, since the 2016/17 aca­d­e­mic year the num­ber of women in STEM sub­jects has grown over­all, al­beit only slightly. In ab­solute terms, the num­ber of fe­male stu­dents went from 16,000 in STEM de­grees in the 2016/17 aca­d­e­mic year to 18,000 in the 2022/23 aca­d­e­mic year (for men, the num­bers were 53,000 and 57,000, re­spec­tively).

How­ever, if we look at the per­cent­age of fe­male stu­dents in cer­tain STEM sub­jects, such as com­puter sci­ence (16%), math­e­mat­ics (25%), au­to­mo­tive (5%) and telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions (13%), the room for im­prove­ment in mak­ing up ground is huge.

The ar­gu­ments for why it is ur­gent to close the gap be­tween the sexes in study­ing STEM sub­jects are sev­eral. First, be­cause the lack of vo­ca­tion for tech­ni­cal sub­jects among young women en­dan­gers their work prospects in an in­creas­ingly tech­no­log­i­cal world; sec­ondly, be­cause di­ver­sity within busi­ness or­gan­i­sa­tions makes them more prof­itable, and, fur­ther­more, be­cause with­out women in the pro­fes­sions in which the prod­ucts and ser­vices of the fu­ture are de­signed and branded, gen­der bi­ases will per­sist that can ex­clude half of the pop­u­la­tion.

“The fact that the de­gree sub­jects with the best job prospects and the best re­mu­ner­a­tion in the labour mar­ket are the ones with the most fe­male un­der­rep­re­sen­ta­tion is un­fair and must be re­versed,” be­lieves Jose­fina An­toni­juan, vice-rec­tor of so­cial re­spon­si­bil­ity and equal­ity at Cat­alo­nia’s Poly­tech­nic Uni­ver­sity (UPC), the coun­try’s lead­ing pub­lic uni­ver­sity in the fields of ar­chi­tec­ture, en­gi­neer­ing, sci­ence and tech­nol­ogy.

Mean­while, the pres­i­dent of the As­so­ci­a­tion of In­dus­trial En­gi­neers of Cat­alo­nia, Maria Salamero, points out that the di­ver­sity of views in teams al­lows com­pa­nies, ad­min­is­tra­tions and any type of or­gan­i­sa­tion to make bet­ter de­ci­sions, “and not only di­ver­sity of gen­der but also of age, abil­i­ties, and so on,” she says. In fact, the lack of di­verse view­points has for years con­tributed to the short­com­ings of prod­ucts, such as the de­sign of car seat belts that do not take into ac­count preg­nant women or elec­tronic de­vices to mon­i­tor the user’s state of health that do not in­clude fe­male-spe­cific vari­ables.

It was not until last year that the Swedish Na­tional Road and Trans­port Re­search In­sti­tute de­vel­oped the first fe­male crash test dummy ever in his­tory. Until now, no one had taken into ac­count that women are gen­er­ally shorter than men and that their mus­cles, hips and torso are dif­fer­ent. “If there are no women in the au­to­mo­tive sec­tor, there won’t be any­one to think about how women drive,” adds Salamero.

The de­vel­op­ment of ar­ti­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence also poses a chal­lenge: if the data used comes from very mas­culinised en­vi­ron­ments, it will be re­flected in the data­bases which “will be male-ori­ented and will per­pet­u­ate gen­der bias,” ar­gues An­toni­juan.

The low pres­ence of women in sci­ence and tech ca­reers from which new tech­nol­ogy flows reached a turn­ing point in 2018, when dif­fer­ent ini­tia­tives began to emerge to counter this deficit. The STEM Women Con­gress is a good ex­am­ple, under jour­nal­ist Eva Díaz and ex­ec­u­tive in the tech­no­log­i­cal busi­ness world Mar Por­ras, who de­cided in 2019 to launch an event to en­cour­age more women to join the STEM sec­tor. The as­pi­ra­tion is to give vis­i­bil­ity and pro­mote fe­male tal­ent in the STEM sphere.

Mireia Usart, Serra Húnter lec­turer in ed­u­ca­tional re­search and a re­searcher in ed­u­ca­tional tech­nol­ogy, re­cently ran a study on the lack of fe­male tal­ent to be found in STEM sub­jects. The con­clu­sion of the analy­sis was that achiev­ing par­ity in these dis­ci­plines is a slow process that is also due to mul­ti­ple fac­tors. One is the fact that the ini­tia­tives that have been car­ried out so far have tar­geted young women who are al­ready per­suaded and have not been wide enough to bring in new stu­dents. “It is very dif­fi­cult to con­vince those who are not at all at­tracted to this world, be­cause from the out­side it looks to them to be very mas­culinised,” says Usart, who gives the ex­am­ple of video games and ro­bot­ics, which con­tinue to be mostly linked to com­bat sce­nar­ios, “a theme that arouses lit­tle in­ter­est among girls,” adds Usart.

The fact is that the stereo­types linked to these pro­fes­sions begin to be ab­sorbed at a very early age. There are stud­ies that show that by the age of six girls have al­ready in­ter­nalised that sci­en­tist, com­puter sci­en­tist or en­gi­neer are male pro­fes­sions, and cul­tural pres­sure con­tin­ues to con­sol­i­date these at­ti­tudes until it’s time for them to choose what they want to be when they grow up.

Cul­tural pres­sure

From the types of toys of­fered to them, to how and who teaches them tech­ni­cal sub­jects, to how the pur­pose of de­gree courses are pre­sented to them, all help cre­ate a world view in girls that more often pushes them to­wards train­ing op­tions linked to the arts, the hu­man­i­ties, the car­ing pro­fes­sion, and so on. Some 81% of peo­ple en­rolled in the field of ed­u­ca­tion are women; 83%, in nurs­ing; 72%, in med­i­cine, and 77%, in lan­guages. “There are some socio-cul­tural fac­tors, some in­di­vid­ual fac­tors of each per­son, as well as in­sti­tu­tional and ed­u­ca­tional pol­icy fac­tors that are be­gin­ning to be de­tected in schools, even in nurs­ery schools, and which con­di­tion us from an early age,” ex­plains Por­ras, pres­i­dent of the STEM Women Con­gress.

How­ever, until only re­cently, most of the ac­tions and ini­tia­tives that had been launched to at­tract fe­male stu­dents to STEM sub­jects have fo­cused on high school stu­dents, when it is al­ready too late.

There is an­other lim­it­ing as­pect linked to cul­tural pres­sure: self-per­cep­tion. From the age of six, a girl al­ready be­gins to be­lieve that she is less ca­pa­ble than a boy in terms of her skills. This is what a study pub­lished by Sci­ence mag­a­zine finds, warn­ing that from their first years of life, girls al­ready tend to dis­count those ac­tiv­i­ties that are con­sid­ered to be for “very in­tel­li­gent” chil­dren. This ends up hav­ing a di­rect im­pact on their choice of aca­d­e­mic and pro­fes­sional fu­ture.

There is over­whelm­ing una­nim­ity among all the ex­perts con­sulted on the fact that the lack of role mod­els is a key cause of the low par­tic­i­pa­tion of girls in STEM sub­jects. Mireia Usart par­tic­i­pates in the dig­i­tal trans­for­ma­tion of schools. She says that while 90% of teach­ers are women, 99% of those re­spon­si­ble for ICT (in­for­ma­tion and com­mu­ni­ca­tions tech­nol­ogy) in pri­mary schools are men. And if we look at the job mar­ket, only 25% of all tech­ni­cal pro­fes­sion­als in ICT sec­tor com­pa­nies in Cat­alo­nia are women, ac­cord­ing to data from the Do­naTIC Barom­e­ter study, which also found that fe­male tal­ent ac­counted for just 37% of new tech hires and 35% of in­ter­nal pro­mo­tions in the tech in­dus­try in 2021.

Por­ras sees re-skilling as a pos­si­ble so­lu­tion: “The dis­ci­plines that are grow­ing have the ad­van­tage that they are mul­ti­dis­ci­pli­nary. I’d tell women that they have the op­por­tu­nity to grow in eco­nom­i­cally bet­ter set­tled ca­reers, to be more in­de­pen­dent and to be mod­els for the new gen­er­a­tions.”

“With foot­ball it has be­come nor­mal for girls to play the sport and there are many more fe­male teams. Well, in sci­ence and tech­nol­ogy, the same logic should be fol­lowed”, ex­plains Zoila Babot, head of com­mu­ni­ca­tion at the Barcelona In­sti­tute of Sci­ence and Tech­nol­ogy (BIST), which is made up of seven re­search cen­tres and heads the 100ti­fiques pro­gramme, a pro­ject that aims to high­light the rel­e­vance and strate­gic role of women in sci­ence and tech­nol­ogy. The ini­tia­tive takes women work­ing in these fields into schools so that girls see from a young age that these are pro­fes­sions in which women can also thrive.

fea­ture WOMEN in STEM

IN­TER­VIEW WOMEN in STEM

“Using role models from the 19th century does not help”

Liliana Arroyo Moliner, the head of Digital Society, holds a degree in sociology from the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB), a PhD in sociology from the University of Barcelona (UB) and is a specialist in digital social innovation. She has been responsible for innovation in the Digital Technology Societies area of the i2Cat Foundation and researcher at the Institute for Social Innovation (Esade).

What do you think makes girls shy away from STEM vocations?
There are multiple reasons. The first is the number of gender biases around these professional profiles. Girls grow up with the burden of “impostor syndrome”, a problem of lack of confidence in occupying traditionally male positions. And then there’s a lack of role models, both male and female. That’s key. We find that when a girl has a role model at home, she’s much more likely to study a career related to the technical field. Even if he’s the father; he doesn’t have to be a female role model. Then there’s the snowball effect.
Is there a clear consensus that role models are needed?
Yes, but we must be careful with them, because lately some roles have reappeared that may not help, such as 19th-century figures or women who have had to leave their lives to one side or have a series of burdens associated with working in the world of technology. This does no good to the cause. And how we explain these careers is especially critical. What interests girls is very different from what interests boys, and we must know how to adapt so that what we’re proposing is understood.
In what way?
Boys and girls have a very different approach when choosing a career. In general terms, the girls’ vocation is to improve the lives of those close to them, and for boys it’s generally enough to think it’s a successful job opportunity. They’re much more instrumental.
So the key here is how we sell these careers?
That’s very important. Here at Digital Society we’ve contributed to a campaign to create women scientist role models, who explain their careers from a different point of view. For example, a woman who studied computer science because she wanted to cure cancer, and explained that being a computer engineer gave her a knowledge of data to help create a tool to fight this disease.
So the challenge is how to talk about technology?
Yes, exactly. We should talk about technology not as a solution, not as an end in itself, because that’s a very short path, but as a means to achieve other things, because this also implies a much more inclusive and fair vision.
Sign in. Sign in if you are already a verified reader. I want to become verified reader. To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader.
Note: To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader and accept the conditions of use.