Books

Remembering Paula Rego

Paula Rego died on June 8 this year. Though she had no connection with Catalonia and probably never visited Barcelona, one of her best-known early paintings was Stray Dogs (The Dogs of Barcelona), a miniature in oil from 1965

UNLIKE MOST WOMEN WHO ABANDON THEIR CAREERS TO BECOME CARERS, REGO FOUND FAME HER PAINTINGS DERIVE FROM AN ANGER ACCUMULATED OVER DECADES

The cat­a­lyst for the pic­ture was a re­port in The Times about how Barcelona’s au­thor­i­ties had placed poi­soned meat in the streets to kill hun­gry dogs roam­ing the city. The meat killed non-stray dogs, too. Even chil­dren, it was ru­moured, picked up the meat. The story was de­nied by the Franco regime.

Rego was in­spired to paint a pow­er­ful pic­ture against the dic­ta­tor­ship’s “care­less, off­hand” dis­re­gard for an­i­mal and human life. She ex­plained that she had a book of Ro­manesque paint­ings, in one of which Saint Jerome is hav­ing his wounds licked and healed by “kindly” dogs. She put him into the pic­ture, along with a frieze of twisted dogs dying in pain. Flies are dot­ted all over the paint­ing.

The Dogs of Barcelona also had a very per­sonal gen­e­sis. You can find Rego ex­plain­ing it in her per­fect upper-class Eng­lish on YouTube (type in “Paula Rego Dogs of Barcelona”). She had com­pleted the main part of the pic­ture, but there was a gap at the top. Won­der­ing how to fin­ish the paint­ing, Rego came down­stairs from her stu­dio and found her hus­band and a “very beau­ti­ful Ital­ian girl” that she and her hus­band knew “snog­ging” in the liv­ing-room. After a row, the fu­ri­ous Rego went back up­stairs and:

I put her on top of the pic­ture, …a mon­strous fig­ure with her tongue hang­ing out and her eyes pop­ping out… The big fat lumpy thing on top is her…. Noth­ing to do with dogs, but some­thing to do with dogs, be­cause it is a mon­strous crea­ture up there.

It is a pic­ture “full of vi­o­lence and dis­gust and flies, you know, merda”.

I asked sev­eral el­derly Barcelona friends about the story of the poi­soned meat and none re­called it, which might mean that the peo­ple I asked were too young at the time or that the au­thor­i­ties had suc­cess­fully cov­ered up the scan­dal - or that the Times story was false. One friend, though, did tell me that he re­mem­bers a 1960s culling of feral cats in the Eix­am­ple, ev­i­dence at least that the Coun­cil did take ac­tion against un­vac­ci­nated, un­cared-for an­i­mals.

The story of the com­po­si­tion of The Dogs of Barcelona is also one about the cre­ation of art. Rego was an angry young woman liv­ing in Lon­don in exile from the Por­tuguese dic­ta­tor­ship who told a story in the paint­ing about fas­cism’s dis­dain for human life. She was also in­spired by in­ti­mate fury at her hus­band and the Ital­ian girl. Pub­lic, po­lit­i­cal anger en­twined with in­ti­mate an­guish. And, of course, anger and rage only lead to one’s own ill health un­less one has the ed­u­ca­tion and skill to turn feel­ing into pow­er­ful im­ages that can reach other peo­ple. As Paula Rego could.

Carer or ca­reer

Rego was born in Lis­bon in 1935. Her anti-fas­cist, mid­dle-class par­ents sent her to St. Ju­lian’s, then the only Eng­lish school in the city, to avoid the lim­ited and op­pres­sive ed­u­ca­tion pro­vided by the Salazar dic­ta­tor­ship, and then to Lon­don. In 1952, she en­tered the Slade Art School, win­ning the school’s sum­mer com­po­si­tion prize in 1954. She con­tin­ued to draw and paint, but her ca­reer stut­tered to a halt. Then she mar­ried the painter Vic­tor Will­ing, brought up three chil­dren and cared for her hus­band, who had de­vel­oped mul­ti­ple scle­ro­sis in 1968 and died 20 years later. Un­like most women who aban­don their ca­reers to be­come car­ers, Rego sub­se­quently found fame, erupt­ing onto the art scene in the 1980s. She be­came a fig­u­ra­tive painter: The Dogs of Barcelona is not typ­i­cal of her later, more fa­mous work.

Her paint­ings are angry, de­riv­ing from an anger ac­cu­mu­lated over decades, she ex­plained, at dic­ta­tor­ship, women’s op­pres­sion and her own sit­u­a­tion. Her mother was “a ca­su­alty of the so­ci­ety she lived in… They en­cour­aged women to do noth­ing. And the less they did, the more they were ad­mired for it - women of a cer­tain class, that is. Poor women had to do bloody every­thing.”

Rego’s art was never more po­lit­i­cal than in her 1998 se­ries on abor­tion. Her vis­ceral, un­set­tling de­pic­tions of back-street abor­tions helped change the law in Por­tu­gal: they were used in the suc­cess­ful 2007 ref­er­en­dum cam­paign. The im­pact of the fe­male gaze com­bat­ing the male gaze was clear­est in her paint­ings of young women stand­ing over a bucket or sit­ting on a bed and star­ing de­fi­antly at the viewer. Rego’s abor­tion pic­tures chal­lenge the typ­i­cal soft-porn fan­tasies of girls look­ing coy and sexy. Re­al­ity is the abor­tion.

book re­view

Sign in. Sign in if you are already a verified reader. I want to become verified reader. To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader.
Note: To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader and accept the conditions of use.