Books

books

daniel pALOMERAS. GP and writer

A murderer on the Costa Brava

“The doctor’s years of experience is not enough, it is not enough that his clinical eye detected what is wrong with them straight away because he has already seen it a thousand times”

Doc­tors are not al­ways the good guys in nov­els. It is some­thing that should not sur­prise us: there are few pro­fes­sions that are so ro­man­ti­cised in fic­tion and so ma­ligned in pri­vate. Char­ac­ters usu­ally keep to a pat­tern of hon­esty and ded­i­ca­tion that in the wider world does not cor­re­spond to re­al­ity. These facts are il­lus­trated in a novel that was all the rage a few years ago, by the renowned Dutch writer Her­man Koch. The first words from the pro­tag­o­nist, Dr. Schlosser, are: ”I am a gen­eral prac­ti­tioner.” The jour­nal­ist Lluís Bonada pub­lished an in­ter­view with the au­thor in the mag­a­zine, El temps. Asked about where the story is set, Koch ad­mit­ted it was the Costa Brava, where he spends the sum­mers.

Specif­i­cally, the au­thor men­tions a place be­tween Calella de Palafrugell, Llafranc, Tamariu and Pals. He also gives some clues about his char­ac­ter. He is a mur­derer but not a mon­ster, and there are things to like about him, as he is at­ten­tive to his fam­ily and the reader can even iden­tify with his mo­tives for vengeance. He ob­serves work and life with a cyn­i­cism that a reader who is also a doc­tor will find un­pleas­ant, al­though it al­lows him to avoid com­pla­cency. Asked “Do you know if there are many doc­tors who be­have with the same lack of sen­si­tiv­ity to their pa­tients?” The an­swer: “I think so. Most gen­eral prac­ti­tion­ers have told me that a good num­ber of them end up that way... More than one of them has thanked me for say­ing things pub­licly.”

What are those things? The ex­pres­sion of so­cially in­cor­rect feel­ings of re­pul­sion for the pro­fes­sion and pa­tients, a lack of con­sid­er­a­tion on be­half of spe­cial­ists and hos­pi­tal staff to­wards the gen­eral prac­ti­tioner… Koch is not a doc­tor, but he seems to know some. Es­pe­cially in­ter­est­ing is the char­ac­ter of a pro­fes­sor ex­pelled from uni­ver­sity be­cause of his rad­i­cal opin­ions, Dr. Aaron Herzl, pos­si­bly in­spired by an aca­d­e­mic who taught un­ortho­dox stud­ies on the per­son­al­i­ties of crim­i­nals. His opin­ions are the dis­til­la­tion of co­her­ent and lucid think­ing but laden with cyn­i­cism.

Here is a taste of what Dr. Schlosser thinks about his pa­tients: “My pa­tients con­fuse time with at­ten­tion...What I needed to see I saw in a minute, the other 19 I fill with at­ten­tion... I make an in­ter­ested face. Mean­while, I write some­thing on a piece of paper. Oc­ca­sion­ally I ask them to un­dress be­hind the screen, but I nor­mally avoid it. Their bod­ies are al­ready un­pleas­ant with their clothes on… I pre­tend to look but I think about other things… Some pa­tients can hardly hide their dis­ap­point­ment. A sim­ple pre­scrip­tion? They are dis­heart­ened for few sec­onds, with their pants around their knees. They have asked for a morn­ing off work, they want more for their money… The doc­tor’s years of ex­pe­ri­ence is not enough, it is not enough that his clin­i­cal eye de­tected what is wrong with them straight away be­cause he has seen it a thou­sand times... Ex­plain­ing the work of a fam­ily doc­tor is easy. All he has to do is avoid send­ing too many pa­tients to the spe­cial­ists and hos­pi­tals… The sys­tem would col­lapse.”»

And to end, some ex­otic thoughts from pro­fes­sor Herzl: “Cul­ture and the rule of law force us to con­trol our in­stincts. But in­stinct is never far away. It waits to at­tack when no one is pay­ing at­ten­tion.” “In fact, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth is much closer to human na­ture than we dare openly admit.” “Ninety per cent of women find mar­ried men more at­trac­tive than sin­gle men… Sin­gle and avail­able men are like a house that has been empty for too long. There must be some­thing wrong with it.” “The di­nosaurs pop­u­lated our planet for 160 mil­lion years and then went ex­tinct. What a waste of time! There is no di­rect evo­lu­tion­ary line be­tween the di­nosaurs and hu­mans. If hu­man­ity and the con­tin­u­ance of the species were so im­por­tant, why have the di­nosaurs first?”

Among the novel’s virtues I would high­light these and other shock­ing re­flec­tions, rather than the plot, which is at­trac­tive but a bit ir­reg­u­lar. In short, sum­mer read­ing for a hol­i­day on the Costa Brava.

*

Daniel Palom­eras is also the au­thor of Dic­cionari mèdic essen­cial (Edi­cions 62)

Sign in. Sign in if you are already a verified reader. I want to become verified reader. To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader.
Note: To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader and accept the conditions of use.