News

THE LAST WORD

Who we ARE

It may be some­thing of a para­dox, but the key to un­der­stand­ing what fu­ture lies in store for hu­man­ity could be to look back­wards. We study our­selves as hu­mans in many ways, through sci­ence, lit­er­a­ture, art, his­tory, phi­los­o­phy, but I’d argue that one of the most valu­able – and most over­looked – fo­rums for ex­plor­ing who we are is an­thro­pol­ogy.

Mod­ern hu­mans, homo sapi­ens, evolved some 300,000 years ago. Such a long timescale makes the dawn of civil­i­sa­tion in Mesopotamia about 5,000 years ago seem like just other day, and the long, long story of how our an­ces­tors lived, died, sur­vived and evolved must hold lessons that today can help us un­der­stand our­selves and guide us as we move into the years, cen­turies and mil­len­nia ahead.

In Cat­alo­nia, one of the an­thro­pol­o­gists who has ar­guably done more than any­one to ad­vance the study of our species and draw con­clu­sions that might help us progress is Eu­dald Car­bonell. You can find an in­ter­view with Car­bonell on page 27 in this issue of the mag­a­zine, where he talks about his new book, Liv­ing Mat­ter, Think­ing Life. In the in­ter­view, the vet­eran ar­chae­ol­o­gist gives some of his recipes for how hu­man­ity should con­tinue its evo­lu­tion and re­solve some of the is­sues that threaten it. If Car­bonell talks with con­fi­dence and cer­tainty about sub­jects that most of us would caveat to death, it is be­cause his decades study­ing our species and how we evolved means he has a deep un­der­stand­ing of who we are, how we think and act, as well as our strengths and short­com­ings.

I was for­tu­nate to meet Eu­dald a few years ago, when I in­ter­viewed him on El Punt Avui tele­vi­sion. I have al­ways had an in­ter­est in an­thro­pol­ogy and so I was over the moon to meet Cat­alo­nia’s an­swer to In­di­ana Jones and get the chance to pick his brains.

As an aside, what you don’t get from the in­ter­view in this issue is Eu­dald’s warmth and larger-than-life char­ac­ter. I had never met him be­fore, but he greeted me en­thu­si­as­ti­cally in a boom­ing voice wor­thy of Brian Blessed and with a vig­or­ous hand­shake and a hearty back­slap.

While we talked about many sub­jects dur­ing the 40-minute in­ter­view, be­fore we fin­ished I was de­ter­mined to get to the bot­tom of this an­thro­pol­ogy thing. If my the­ory that we have plenty to learn from our an­ces­tors is true, it de­pends on early homo sapi­ens being just like us. I am a man in my late for­ties, I told Eu­dald, mar­ried with two teenage chil­dren. I worry about how my kids will turn out and how I can help them grow into re­spon­si­ble, suc­cess­ful adults. I also worry about my abil­ity to con­tinue to put food on the table, and about the back pain that has only ap­peared re­cently. I miss my dead par­ents ter­ri­bly, but I am over­joyed that my son is as pas­sion­ate as me about my foot­ball team. I won­der how I will deal with the sit­u­a­tion when my daugh­ter brings her first boyfriend home. I take spe­cial plea­sure in watch­ing the sun rise when I’m out with the dog in the early morn­ings.

In short, I painted Eu­dald a pic­ture of a typ­i­cal 21st-cen­tury, mid­dle-aged man, and then I asked him that if we were to go back in time 30,000 years, and we found a man of a sim­i­lar age, would he be any­thing like me. Eu­dald smiled and fixed me with a pen­e­trat­ing eye. “Neil,” he said, “he would be ex­actly the same as you!”

Sign in. Sign in if you are already a verified reader. I want to become verified reader. To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader.
Note: To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader and accept the conditions of use.