News

Women’s balancing act

The pandemic has made it clear that women still carry the main burdens in the family

Tak­ing care of chil­dren, cook­ing, wash­ing clothes and clean­ing while also tele­work­ing has been the sit­u­a­tion for many women since March. Those un­able to work from home have seen a 100% re­duc­tion in their work­ing hours, while oth­ers are un­em­ployed and oth­ers have con­tin­ued going to work with, in many cases, their chil­dren left alone at home. Among the worst hit have been house­holds with one par­ent, of which 79% are fe­male sin­gle-par­ent fam­i­lies. In fact, the data show that the pan­demic in gen­eral has af­fected women the most. There has been more un­em­ploy­ment among women and more job in­se­cu­rity, while they have also suf­fered more stress dur­ing the pan­demic.

How does this fit with the con­cept of bal­anc­ing work with fam­ily life? Ac­cord­ing to a study by the Cen­tre for Opin­ion Stud­ies car­ried out from May 4 to 15, some 36.5% of men spent five hours or less a week doing chores at home and 10.5% ac­knowl­edged that they usu­ally did noth­ing. Lock­down and the health cri­sis - which is not yet over - have been ex­pe­ri­enced dif­fer­ently in each house­hold ac­cord­ing to gen­der.

This by no means im­plies that the re­la­tion­ship be­tween women and men is some sort of strug­gle be­tween good and evil, but the num­bers do not lie. It should also be noted that, ac­cord­ing to the ex­perts, while data are avail­able on het­ero­sex­ual fam­i­lies, data on other types of unions are lack­ing. The virus has put the focus on every as­pect of our lives, and one of these is gen­der equal­ity. While for many years we have heard about the “glass ceil­ing”, that in­vis­i­ble bar­rier that pre­vents women from being pro­moted to man­age­ment po­si­tions, Covid-19 has shone the light on the “sticky floor” con­cept. Ac­cord­ing to the Cen­tre for So­ci­o­log­i­cal Stud­ies on Every­day Life and Work, it is “im­pos­si­ble for many women to get pro­moted in their jobs be­cause they are mostly em­ployed in labour-in­ten­sive sec­tors, with pre­car­i­ous work­ing con­di­tions, with poor pay and char­ac­terised by low lev­els of pro­mo­tion.” These are sec­tors such as clean­ing or those in­volv­ing car­ing for peo­ple.

The Women, Busi­ness and Econ­omy Ob­ser­va­tory says that of the 715,000 peo­ple at the fore­front of the fight against coro­n­avirus in Cat­alo­nia, 65% are women. “These are fem­i­nised and in­se­cure sec­tors that, para­dox­i­cally, are the ones that, by de­cree, have been es­tab­lished as es­sen­tial since the state of alarm was de­clared. Why, if both paid and un­paid care work is vital, does it not have the recog­ni­tion and value it de­serves?” In June, the Cata­lan gov­ern­ment pub­lished The Eco­nomic Im­pact of the Covid-19 Cri­sis from a Gen­der Per­spec­tive. The list of vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties it de­tails, from the first page, is long: women are still the main ones re­spon­si­ble for the home and every­thing that goes with it, while moth­ers in sin­gle-par­ent fam­i­lies are the least likely to achieve a bal­ance be­tween work and fam­ily life, and some have been left with­out any in­come.

The sur­vey by Lídia Farré and Lib­er­tad González car­ried out on­line from April 4 to 30 as­sesses the eco­nomic and so­cial im­pact of Covid-19. Farré is a pro­fes­sor at Barcelona Uni­ver­sity and an as­so­ci­ate re­searcher at the In­sti­tute of Eco­nomic Analy­sis. “The dis­tri­b­u­tion of house­hold chores has re­mained the same as be­fore Covid-19. If it was 60% for women and 40% for men, it has con­tin­ued like this, ex­cept for the task of going shop­ping, which is the only job that men have taken over. It doesn’t mean that men haven’t done any­thing, be­cause the in­creased need for car­ing for chil­dren or the el­derly, for cook­ing or clean­ing has been very great. Men have in­creased the num­ber of hours they spend on do­mes­tic tasks, but we have not reached 50-50. In fact, in cou­ples in which both have tele­worked, the most log­i­cal thing would have been to share it like this, but that’s not what we’ve seen in the sur­veys.” Al­though the re­search is on­go­ing, it has al­ready been shown that gen­der roles are well-es­tab­lished and have very deep roots.

Some­thing else that is key, ex­perts say, is moth­er­hood. The roles that so­ci­ety at­trib­utes to women - or that women have come to ac­cept - be­come very de­fined when chil­dren ar­rive. Yet, Farré re­flects on the pos­i­tive change brought about by the cri­sis and com­pares it to when fa­thers began tak­ing pa­ter­nity leave and “they be­came more in­volved in life­long par­ent­ing.” One study, she says, found “a pos­i­tive im­pact from men’s con­tri­bu­tion to house­hold chores.” And she con­tin­ues: “The hope is that be­cause the lock­down was much longer than pa­ter­nity leave these men have in­creased their par­tic­i­pa­tion. There has been an ap­pren­tice­ship dur­ing the lock­down! There are fa­thers who are now more aware of the sit­u­a­tion: that the kids do ex­tracur­ric­u­lar ac­tiv­i­ties on Tues­days and Thurs­days, that the fridge needs fill­ing to be able to make lunch... If dur­ing this pe­riod men have taken their chil­dren to the park or spent more time with them, why can’t they go on to fin­ish work early and go to pick them up from school?”

There is rea­son for hope, but there are opin­ions of all kinds. There are also those who think we are going too slow, that the steps being taken can­not sat­isfy the de­sire for change. A sur­vey on the use of time and the lock­down from the Cen­tre for Opin­ion Stud­ies pro­vides shock­ing num­bers. Car­ried out be­tween May 4 and 15, one ques­tion was whether there was an equal dis­tri­b­u­tion of tasks. Some 42.6% of men made a very gen­er­ous as­sess­ment of them­selves and said they al­ready equally shared the tasks be­fore the lock­down. How­ever, only 27.1% of women said that was the case. When asked if house­work was shared among the whole fam­ily in the lock­down, 75.3% of men said it was but only 54.2% of women said that was the case. Whether the men mag­ni­fied their role or min­imised that of their part­ner, what is clear is that the num­bers do not add up.

The Com­plutense Uni­ver­sity’s psy­chopathol­ogy re­search group on af­fec­tive and psy­chotic dis­or­ders stud­ied the psy­cho­log­i­cal re­sponse to Covid-19 in Spain. Symp­toms of de­pres­sion (27.8% in women, 17% in men) and anx­i­ety (26.8% in women and 13.2% in men) have been dif­fer­ent for each gen­der. Part of the men­tal bur­den is due to man­age­ment. With chil­dren at home and par­ents tele­work­ing, who gets to use the com­puter when, and who works early in the day and who later on? Or­gan­i­sa­tion is per­haps the most im­por­tant as­pect of home life and is also the most in­vis­i­ble. One ex­pert says this: “Men may have gone shop­ping, but who wrote the list?”

Co-re­spon­si­ble men

Mar Gaya, founder of the Igua­lando con­sul­tants, spe­cialises in the im­ple­men­ta­tion of equal­ity plans in busi­nesses. She is VP of the 50a50 or­gan­i­sa­tion, which pro­motes the equal par­tic­i­pa­tion of women and men in man­age­ment po­si­tions. “It’s not the Covid-19 cri­sis but the short­com­ings of the sys­tem have been high­lighted. If we think every­thing is due to Covid, once it goes then every­thing should be re­solved. But it won’t be be­cause it’s struc­tural.” Yet, the areas that Covid has il­lu­mi­nated are many. One is clear: to what ex­tent do house­holds have the means to man­age them­selves? “We’re al­ways talk­ing about women bal­anc­ing work and fam­ily life, but it’s time to talk about co-re­spon­si­bil­ity and to focus on the other 50%, which are fa­thers, chil­dren, sib­lings, and in­te­grat­ing the male fig­ure into care.”

Gaya is still analysing the sce­nario. “There’s a pre-Covid image of work-life bal­ance I’ve al­ways re­jected: a woman with a child on her back in front of the com­puter. I tried it some years ago and it was im­pos­si­ble! Now, with lock­down, there’s been a lack of co-re­spon­si­bil­ity at all lev­els. Moth­ers teach­ing kids how to do frac­tions while re­view­ing a work doc­u­ment and at­tend­ing to grandma... There’s a study that says a woman can work with­out in­ter­rup­tion for up to an hour. For a man, it’s two.”

The Women, Busi­ness and Econ­omy Ob­ser­va­tory high­lighted in 2017 that Cat­alo­nia’s GDP would go up by 23% if care and do­mes­tic work were quan­ti­fied and in­cluded. If we go out for din­ner, we can spend 20 euros on pizza and it is re­flected in GDP. If we make the pizza at home, only the value of the raw ma­te­ri­als goes to GDP. Gaya says: “What’s work and what isn’t? In the end it’s about whether the work is paid.” The most par­a­dig­matic case is women doing house­hold chores. “It’s the first time in his­tory that they have had any help! So what does the sys­tem con­sider to be work? ”

Júlia Mas is a so­ci­ol­o­gist and gen­der ex­pert who has been in­volved in gen­der equal­ity for years. “The gen­eral pic­ture I get from lock­down is that women have car­ried much of the bur­den. There are two lev­els: women who were work­ing out­side the home and those who weren’t, and those who had fam­ily re­spon­si­bil­i­ties tak­ing care of chil­dren or other de­pen­dents and those who did not.”

Mas con­tin­ues: “It’s very pos­i­tive and in­ter­est­ing that many women are say­ing they want to make changes. Un­for­tu­nately, a lot of changes need to be made. And every­thing is con­nected: a lot of things de­pend on what kind of work a woman has out­side the home, be­cause the sec­tors with more women are the ones with the worst con­di­tions and with the most im­pact on health and sta­bil­ity.” Mas is adamant: “Lock­down has led to sit­u­a­tions of in­jus­tice, of over­whelm­ing bur­dens.”

Is tele­work­ing good?

There are di­verse opin­ions where tele­work is con­cerned. It can be a break­through, they say, if it is done by both men and women. Yet, they also say it is im­per­a­tive that it does not be­come a trap for women in which they end up with three work­ing days: a day of work, an­other look­ing after the home, and a third thanks to tech­nol­ogy that al­lows us to ex­tend our work­ing day. Farré adds: “I trust that there’ll be a change to­wards a more pro­gres­sive way of doing things. We have to be op­ti­mistic. Yet, tele­work can’t be­come a fea­ture of women’s work!” And Gaya rec­om­mends “not los­ing sight of co-re­spon­si­bil­ity.” “Every­thing else, tele­work, tech­nol­ogy, are just tools. With­out co-re­spon­si­bil­ity, tele­work is a poi­soned gift,” she adds.

Mas is one of those who is sus­pi­cious. “I’m very crit­i­cal of tele­work­ing. If there’s no reg­u­la­tion and if you don’t un­der­stand what it means, it’s com­pli­cated. The fact that we’re home does not mean total avail­abil­ity. It also af­fects such things as col­lec­tive rights.” There is no ob­vi­ous so­lu­tion, says Mas.

What awaits us

Lib­er­tad González, as­so­ci­ate pro­fes­sor of eco­nom­ics at the Pom­peu Fabra Uni­ver­sity and the Barcelona Grad­u­ate School of Eco­nom­ics, and co-au­thor, with Lídia Farré, of the sur­vey to as­sess the eco­nomic and so­cial im­pact of Covid-19, re­flects on ad­vances in equal­ity that the cri­sis may leave us with. “Un­for­tu­nately, I’m not op­ti­mistic. Per­haps in some house­holds, where the man, due to his cir­cum­stances, has be­come more in­volved in care and house­hold tasks dur­ing the lock­down, he will main­tain this greater in­volve­ment over time. But in most cases, the cri­sis has strength­ened the tra­di­tional di­vi­sion of labour and this can have more last­ing ef­fects, for ex­am­ple, women who ask for leave to con­tinue car­ing for chil­dren, or who, due to fam­ily re­spon­si­bil­i­ties, take longer to look for work if they have lost their job.” González is also crit­i­cal when it comes to tele­work­ing. “We see in the data that tele­work­ing is a bit more com­mon among women, and this can also be a trap, rel­e­gat­ing women to the home en­vi­ron­ment and cre­at­ing the ex­pec­ta­tion that as they are at home they can also take care of house­hold chores.” Like oth­ers, González points out that small ef­forts, such as a change of mind­set, are basic. “Many of us in­ter­nalise the idea that it’s the mother’s re­spon­si­bil­ity to take care of the chil­dren, or at least to a greater ex­tent than the fa­ther. Chang­ing these so­cial norms is much more dif­fi­cult than in­tro­duc­ing gen­der-neu­tral fam­ily poli­cies. If ei­ther par­ent can cut short their work­ing day, why do moth­ers al­ways do it? Co-re­spon­si­bil­ity is a mat­ter for both men and women.”

So, now what? González is sure that all this will have ef­fects, some in the long run. “One will be an in­crease in the gen­der gap in the labour mar­ket – and at home. This cri­sis has af­fected fem­i­nised sec­tors much more than pre­vi­ous crises. This, to­gether with the in­crease in the need for care, and more tele­work­ing, can lead to women going back­wards in the sense of rel­e­gat­ing them­selves to the home and ac­cen­tu­at­ing the tra­di­tional di­vi­sion of labour: the man goes out to work and the woman stays at home. Pub­lic poli­cies must pay at­ten­tion and take this into ac­count and do every­thing pos­si­ble to off­set these ef­fects of the pan­demic.”

fea­ture

fea­ture

Tasks outside the house

The survey on the economic and social impact of Covid-19, by Lídia Farré and Libertad González, has brought to light various issues. For example, men have become more involved in household chores and childcare. Still, there’s only one area in which men do more than women: shopping. For some experts, in queueing for the supermarket men have responded to their role as provider and protector. As barriers are raised, we have also seen quite a few men out with their children. While all progress is good, it must be noted that these activities take place outside the home, whether it is taking the dog out or taking out the rubbish. Despite this rise in domestic activity among men, the traditional roles continue.

ALBA GARCIA

“Women don’t have a caring gene!”

I’ve seen a lot of women who have had to take the lead and take on the family burden.
I’d add the women doing essential work, and especially single women with family responsibilities and dependents. The value of care work must be recognised. Lockdown has meant that in general care work has fallen to women.
What are the consequences?
If you were a worker in an essential sector, such as health or food, you suffered from exposure, the working conditions, the fear of infecting the family... Or the chaos in care homes that was very stressful, mostly for women, who are the main caregivers. It’s time care work was distributed, and not just with men, but society needs to be aware that without this work nothing would function.
Has lockdown aggravated these women’s situation?
It has. The consequences of lockdown have been terrible for many. I’ve done a lot of video conferencing with men and women, and if an attendee had a child on their lap during the meeting, it was almost always a woman.
Maybe a positive thing about all of this is that some women will wake up to the situation.
Women are often feminists due to personal experiences rather than theoretical arguments. Sometimes you have to experience it to be aware of what’s happening and to see that the origin is the division of labour according to sex, which has always existed, but which got worse in the 20th century, when women decided to become part of the paid workforce worldwide. This is where the question of work-life balance arises.
And co-responsibility?
Having children and taking care of people is everyone’s business, not just women’s. We’re not born with a gene that puts us in the role of caregiver. However, all the paid caring jobs are very feminised and are also the lowest paid. In families, it’s good for people to take care of each other but that burden should not just fall on women. A balance needs to be struck.

Women on the front line

Many essential jobs are done by women, in sectors concerned with health, food, cleaning, or caring for people. This means women are more exposed to the virus. As for mental health, Judit Vall, a professor at Barcelona University, says: “We’ve seen during the lockdown, there were four aspects of mental health that have deteriorated. People have had more trouble sleeping, feel overwhelmed and stressed, have been less able to cope with daily difficulties, and have confessed to feeling unhappy and depressed. These effects are substantially greater among women.”

Sign in. Sign in if you are already a verified reader. I want to become verified reader. To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader.
Note: To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader and accept the conditions of use.