Opinion

viewpoint. brett hetherington

Journalist and writer/ bretthetherington.net

Evolution’s forgotten man

This story be­gins in the late 18th cen­tury with a small boy’s lim­it­less cu­rios­ity, at first for star­ing at his mar­bles and stones, but soon this grows into a thirst for know­ing what lies deep be­neath the British coun­try­side around him.

William Smith was un­usual for many rea­sons. As a self-taught young man he trav­elled a great deal fur­ther than most parochial males from farms and this helped to fire his fas­ci­na­tion with the nat­ural world. Un­like al­most all “well-learned” pro­fes­sion­als of his day, he also had no dis­taste about re­peat­edly climb­ing down into dark, dan­ger­ous coal mines.

Here, he was one of the first to study and re­port on that black min­eral where it ac­tu­ally lay. Of course, it was coal and it was coal min­ers who were largely re­spon­si­ble for the In­dus­trial Rev­o­lu­tion that was then rais­ing Britain’s sta­tus to that of an em­pire-build­ing su­per­power.

One of the major found­ing fa­thers of ge­ol­ogy, Smith went on to cover about 10,000 miles a year on foot, on horse and by car­riage, cat­a­logu­ing the lo­ca­tions of all the rock and fos­sil for­ma­tions that are to be found in the UK.

Over 14 long years, he also la­bo­ri­ously pro­duced a giant hand-coloured map that showed ex­actly where the strata of rocks could be found under the earth. No­body had done any­thing of the sort be­fore in such a com­pre­hen­sive and sys­tem­atic way and two cen­turies later this sub­lime mas­ter­work is still ac­cu­rate and rel­e­vant.

World-chang­ing map

In his book ti­tled “The Map that Changed the World” Simon Win­ches­ter makes the valu­able point that Smith’s “lonely and po­ten­tially soul-de­stroy­ing pro­ject” was done, at this time in our his­tory, “in a wholly un­known area of imag­i­na­tive de­duc­tion; there were no teach­ers, no guide­books.”

As well as these lim­i­ta­tions, Smith could have looked around and no­ticed that even sci­en­tists were con­vinced, for ex­am­ple, that “moun­tains grew like trees, or­gan­i­cally, up­wards and out­wards,” all ap­par­ently from god’s de­sign.

Smith played a major part in the grind­ing process where re­li­gious and other su­per­sti­tious be­liefs were slowly being cast off (just as we today are [hope­fully] liv­ing in an era where stu­pid­ity re­lated to gen­der, race or sex­ual and na­tional prej­u­dices are fi­nally start­ing to die.)

For most of his ca­reer Smith was also an ex­pert in the cru­cial pro­gramme of canal build­ing, but he was in fact snubbed by the main or­gan­i­sa­tion or ‘so­ci­ety’ of his pro­fes­sion as a ge­ol­o­gist.

His work­ing-class fam­ily back­ground meant that a cou­ple of the ‘per­fumed’ snobs who ran and fi­nanced what was in truth lit­tle more than a gen­tle­men’s club could steal his ideas and claim them as their own. Largely as a re­sult of this, Smith was to spend time in a debtors prison in Lon­don. He was to write with un­der­stand­able bit­ter­ness that “the the­ory of ge­ol­ogy is in the pos­ses­sion of one class of men [and] the prac­tise in an­other.”

De­spite his on and off fi­nan­cial prob­lems, William Smith clearly de­serves a much greater and more promi­nent place in the col­lec­tive mem­ory of sci­ence’s lead­ing men and women. His name mer­its being up there with the likes of Charles Dar­win, Al­bert Ein­stein or Richard Dawkins.

Sign in. Sign in if you are already a verified reader. I want to become verified reader. To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader.
Note: To leave comments on the website you must be a verified reader and accept the conditions of use.